|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
The Creation-Evolution Debate This debate is often seen as: 1. Something utterly ludicrous that should be
ignored This view is often (but
not always) held by those already strongly in favour of one side of the
debate or the other, and are fed up with the argument. 2. Something extremely important that should
be hotly debated Again, this view is often
(but not always) held by those already strongly in favour of one side or the
other. But these people (on both
sides) feel the need to ‘put things straight’. 3. A minefield too complex (or too silly) to
be negotiated This view tends to be
held by those who have grown up with one side of the debate or the other,
have then tried to see it from the other side, from hearing and/or reading
the debate (either sketchily or in detail) and have given up. Each of these views is
understandable because the debate
often goes nowhere! In the past,
one of the most frequent reasons for the debate going nowhere was that on one
side of the argument there were theologians with little knowledge of the
sciences, and on the other side there were scientists with little knowledge
of the Scriptures. This inevitably
ended with both sides feeling somewhat contemptuous of the other, and the
division deepened. Fortunately, in recent years, this
has happened less often. Theologians actively entering the debate have
tended to have a greater understanding of some of the basic scientific
principles, and scientists actively
entering the debate have tended to have a greater understanding of the
Scriptures. BUT . . . the debate still often goes nowhere! And still
either side can be left feeling rather disdainful of the other. One of the reasons for the debate
still going nowhere, is a tendency towards sweeping statements, made by
either side against the other, ie: ‘Scientists will tell you . . .’ or ‘Bible-bashers/Christians/Sky-Pilots will
tell you . . .’ and then proceeding to mention a stand-point that members
of the opposite side do not
necessarily hold! No wonder
antagonism exists. No wonder it can be
seen as a minefield. No wonder it can
be seen as ludicrous. No wonder people
give up. The debate is no longer as clear-cut
(if it was ever clear-cut) between theologians
and scientists. Many theologians feel that the biblical
story of creation is an allegory, and believe that there is actually no
conflict between the pattern of the evolution theory and the pattern given in
the Creation Story of Genesis. The
important fact for these people is not HOW the earth was made, but WHO
made it. On the other hand there are
many scientists, some with multiple doctorates in the relevant fields (ie:
geology, biology, chemistry, anthropology, palaeontology, sedimentology,
dendrology etc) who are not necessarily Christians, and yet are convinced that the theory of evolution is badly flawed, that the earth could very well be a young earth, and that the universe is
a product of some kind of intelligent
design. Strangely enough, the complexity
that now exists has actually made the debate a whole lot more interesting!
If you have ever thought that believing in Creation would be little
more than an intellectual embarrassment, click onto the ‘Creation Ministries’ link at the end of the page and be prepared
to be fascinated. On the other hand, it needs to be
remembered that the Creation Narrative is, in fact, a known Hebrew poem. This too is fascinating, particularly as it
is an accepted point among most bible scholars. Ancient Hebrew poetry did not need
to follow the same sort of guidelines as poetry today, with metre, rhythm or
rhyme. Much Hebrew poetry was written
in prose form. This type of poetry followed various
traditional patterns, forms and shapes, and used repetition
and expansion of themes, ideas and concepts. The Creation
Narrative of Genesis is one such Hebrew poem, and a brief part of the shape
and theme-expansion is shown in the chart below. Each of the first three days
describes a principle, and the next three days expand on these same three
principles. Day Seven is God’s
declared day of rest. |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
However, just because the Creation
Narrative is a poem does not mean
that it is not true. Alfred Tennyson’s ‘Charge of the Light
Brigade’ is just a poem, but it does not mean that the Crimean War did not
happen. Tennyson’s poem graphically
describes a small part of the
large overall event. In the same way,
the Creation Narrative describes, in poetic form, a small part of an enormous
overall cosmic event – the creation of the universe with its dimensions of
time and space. Whatever your verdict . . . enjoy
the exploration! |
|||||||||||
|
|
Click Here |
|
Back to Brief overview of
the Click Here |
|
|||||||